Questioning the Ethics of Zoo Animal Care

(EDITOR’S NOTE: ⁠View From The Pugh⁠ is a journalism project from ⁠Chris Pugh⁠. ⁠Subscribe to his daily newsletter⁠ and ⁠podcast⁠, ⁠follow him on YouTube⁠ and ⁠sponsor his work⁠)

Today’s post is sponsored by ⁠StreamYard⁠.

For centuries, zoos have been a place where people can see animals from around the world, often for the first time. They have educated generations, inspired conservation movements, and funded critical research. Yet, as society’s understanding of animal welfare grows, so does the debate over whether traditional zoos can truly meet the needs of the creatures they house.

At the heart of the discussion is the question: do zoos serve animals, or do animals serve zoos? Supporters argue that modern zoos contribute significantly to conservation. Many endangered species—such as the California condor, black-footed ferret, and Arabian oryx—have been brought back from the brink of extinction through captive breeding programs. Zoos also provide veterinary care and protect animals from poaching and habitat loss.

However, critics raise concerns about the quality of life in captivity. Even in large, well-funded facilities, animals cannot fully express their natural behaviors. Wide-ranging species like elephants and big cats may struggle in enclosures that can never match the size and complexity of their wild habitats. Some animals develop stereotypic behaviors—repetitive movements or pacing—often seen as signs of stress.

Ethical debates also touch on entertainment versus education. While zoos promote learning, some argue that seeing animals in unnatural settings sends the wrong message, portraying wildlife as passive and existing for human enjoyment. This has led to growing support for wildlife sanctuaries, which aim to provide more natural environments without breeding animals for display.

The conversation is further complicated by the diversity of zoos themselves. Accredited institutions that follow strict welfare guidelines can be worlds apart from roadside menageries or substandard facilities. The global zoo community is also making changes—more emphasis on naturalistic habitats, enrichment activities, and conservation work in the field.

Public opinion is shifting as documentaries, social media, and animal advocacy groups shine light on conditions behind the scenes. Younger generations, in particular, are calling for higher welfare standards or alternatives that focus on protecting animals in the wild rather than keeping them in captivity.

In the end, questioning the ethics of zoo animal care isn’t about villainizing all zoos—it’s about ensuring that animal welfare is prioritized above all else. Whether the future lies in reimagined, conservation-focused zoos or expanded sanctuary networks, one thing is certain: the conversation is far from over.